Powerful Advocacy,  Investigation, Negotiation, and Litigation

Exceptions to the right against warrantless police searches you should know about

On Behalf of | Jun 14, 2023 | Criminal Law |

You probably know that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the police from searching a person’s home without getting a search warrant first. Specifically, the amendment states, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.”

This is a vital civil right that helps prevent law enforcement from abusing its power against ordinary Missoula County residents and protect their privacy. However, like with most things in the law, there are exceptions. Everybody should be aware of these exceptions so they know how far their rights extend in criminal law.

Exceptions to the Fourth Amendment rule

The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals’ right to privacy is strongest inside their homes. But even at home, your right against warrantless police searches and seizures is not absolute. Exceptions include:

  • Consent. Police are allowed to search a home without a warrant if you or another resident consents.
  • Plain view. If the officer sees illegal contraband or evidence of criminal activity in plain view from outside the premises, such as drugs sitting on a table visible through an open window, they are allowed to enter and seize it.
  • Exigent circumstances. An emergency situation involving imminent danger of death or serious property damage, such as a possible explosion, allows police to bypass the warrant requirement.

Whether one of these exceptions applied to a warrantless search of your home could be up for debate. For example, the police might claim you gave them permission to search when you really did not. This would require investigation and a possible court challenge from your defense attorney to resolve. The outcome could mean getting evidence tossed out of court.